Progressives Actually Like Democrats’ New Message

SHARING IS CARING!
Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Tweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest0Share on Reddit0

WASHINGTON — Leading progressives praised the new message introduced by top earners Democrats Monday that worries economic policy, suggesting the party is moving from the internecine finger-pointing that has dogged it since November’s election.

Under the motto “A Better Deal: Better Jobs, Better Benefits, Better Future,”House and Senate Democratic leaders laid a three-pronged platform using notions for generating decent-paying jobs; lowering household costs, chief among these prescriptions medications; and enhancing access to the education and training Americans need to compete in the job market.

The proposals represent the party’s first major attempt to recalibrate its central topics before the 2018 midterm elections and then reestablish its historic reputation as the party of regular working people after RepublicanDonald Trump‘s surprise victory in 2016s presidential race. At a symbolic bid to emphasize their desire to reach a broader swath of all Americans, party leaders announced the new schedule in Berryville, Virginia — some 65 kilometers from the halls of power in Washington.

Prominent liberals, who’ve been nudging the party in this direction for decades, largely welcomed the rebranding effort.

“This really is a very refreshing message it does not seem like poll-tested messaging. It seems true and passionate and daring,” said Tamara Draut, vice president for policy and research at Demos, a progressive think tank and advocacy group.

“A ‘Better Deal,’ and much more to the point, what [Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer and [House Minority Leader] Nancy Pelosi are saying in their new focus, is extremely powerful,” said Alex Lawson, executive director of Social Security Works, a nonprofit struggling to enlarge Social Security and Medicare. “It’s not ideal, but it isn’t just what the grassroots is demanding. However, as a starting point it’s very, very powerful.”

Each Of Us a pressure group that has threatened to assist struggles in primaries against Democratic lawmakers deemed exceptionally progressive, mixed praise with requirements for increased action.

The group termed the schedule “a step toward adopting progressive populism” that “does not go far enough.”

The plan from the leading Democrats “remains unsure about where the party moves tackling climate change, healthcare, rising racism, and free high education, and when they’re willing to force the billionaire class to finally pay their fair share,” Each Of Us mentioned in an announcement

Nina Turner, president of Our Revolution, a band formed to carry on the heritage of the Sen. Bernie Sanders‘ presidential campaign, also noted the omission of climate change and racial justice policies, in addition to a plan to give free college instruction. She credited the party for admitting major deficiencies, but said the real proof would be in attempts to follow through to the schedule’s lofty objectives.

“I hope this is not just a cute way to try and appease folks by forming another committee. We do not require a committee — we require a commitment to actual policy changes,” she said.

A Senate Democratic aide who requested anonymity to comment stated the new message has been focused exclusively on economic policy, that didn’t signify any less of a commitment to combatting climate change, fighting racial justice and other issues.

Tom Williams/Getty Pictures
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) , left, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and other Democrats arrive to present “A Better Deal” in Berryville, Virginia.  

In spite of all the criticism, the answer will be a far cry from the mockery elicited with a previous, leaked draft of the Democratic motto a week: “A Better Deal: Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Wages.”

The phrase’s resemblance to this tagline of ads such asPapa John’s pizza chain and prominent placement of “Better Skills” — an apparent nod to a much-maligned economic conceptthat blames joblessness onto a dearth of trained employees — drew scorn from most corners of the political universe.

The particulars of the suggestion and elimination of the offending “Better Skills” clause quieted a lot of the criticism.

“Absolutely, we must help folks get the skills that they want,” said Draut. “However, it is not the first thing we need to perform and it’s definitely not the first thing people wish to hear. Even individuals with the appropriate skills are having a hard time getting ahead.”

A senior aide to a House Democrat credited Schumer’s political instincts for the party’s populist pivot.

“Chuck Schumer knows which way the wind is blowing. Can’t say that for other members of direction,” said the aide, who requested anonymity to comment.

“A Better Deal” unites several well-known, albeit recent developments to the Democratic canon — a nationwide $15 minimum commission; a $1 trillion infrastructure bundle; 12 months of paid family leave; protecting Social Security and Medicare — using new ideas, such as a small-business tax charge for job training and apprenticeship programs. These latter proposals are very likely to find favor with the party’s pro-business wing.

In presenting ways to reduce households’ costs of living, nevertheless, Schumer, Pelosi and their deputies adopted an anti-monopoly, economic populism that bears little similarity to the centrist triangulation of former President Bill Clinton, or even the free-trade-friendly technocracy of former President Barack Obama.

“You have observed a shift away from the centrist politics and politics of the Democratic Party toward daring ideas that satisfy the challenges facing working people today,” Draut said. “It is a development under way for quite a while now that’s solidified.”

Specifically, Democrats wish to enable the Medicare programto negotiate lower drug prices with pharmaceutical companies, make a new national agency to investigate and enforce actions against prescription drug “price gouging,” and need that drug companies explain significant price gains.

The party is also taking on the issue of corporate consolidation, assuring tougher antitrust rules directed at curbing mega-mergers and using a national watchdog — a “21st century trust buster” — enforce the new regulations after a merger takes place.

The expanding size and reach of a couple of corporations from banks to airlines to technology giants like Amazon, Google and Facebook — has been a subject of increasing interest among progressive intellectuals who attribute new monopoly electricity for problems ranging from the 2008 financial catastrophe to wage stagnation and the decrease in rural America.

Top proponents of daring antitrust action,that preferred Democrats have occasionally been slower to get apart from coverage gurus, were enthused about the new platform and the rhetoric used to market it.

The Democratic leaders promised to follow up with extra tips geared toward making child care more affordable; cracking down on foreign exchange abuses; ensuring high-speed online accessibility; and enhancing retirement security.

Signs have emerged that the party has been eager to mimic the fiery tone and also economic message of Sanders, one of a small number of elected officials that will pack landscapes on short notice and, based on one survey, the nation’s most popular politician. At a Sunday New York Times op-ed previewing the new schedule, Schumer echoed Sanders’ populist topics, promising a “better deal so that this country works for everyone again, not just the elites and special interests.”

“Democrats have too frequently hesitated from taking on … misguided policies directly and unflinchingly — so much so that most Americans do not understand what we stand for,” he also wrote.

Sanders, now a member of Senate Democratic direction despite maintaining his voter registration as a separate, was one of those plugging “A Better Deal” in a 3-minute promotional movie accompanying the rollout in Berryville.

Naturally, the party hasn’t embraced all of the Vermont senator’s policy tastes — steering clear of single-payer health insurance and free college tuition plans that have been the cornerstones of his presidential campaign.

The choice not to adhere to the slate of proposals favored by the remaining won the acceptance of a Democratic moderates.

“There is something in there for many spheres of the party,” said Ladan Ahmadi, a spokeswoman for Third Way, a centrist Democratic think tank. ”

Ahmadi cited the inclusion of job training tax credits as an illustration of the type of policies more adapting to the likes of Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) , a financial conservative.

Nevertheless in a Sunday appearance on ABC’s “This Week” Schumer went further than either he or Pelosi have gone toward endorsing government-run wellness insurance i.e., a single-payer system. That idea is gaining traction with all the Affordable Care Act, a public-private patchwork, on the chopping block.

Saying that Republicans would neglect to repeal Obamacare and that the two parties would then come together to stabilize the marketplaces created by the law, ” Schumer stated, “we’re going to look at broader things — single payer is one of these.”

Other choices “on the table,” he added, include diminishing Medicare’s age eligibility to 55 and enabling users to buy in to Medicare or Medicaid.

Those weary of their party’s attempts to pin blame for Trump’s election on the disturbance of either the Russian government or former FBI director James Comey expressed relief that Schumer was ready to have a hard look in the mirror.

“It’s all about time! It just took them about 8 weeks to understand that the Russia story ain’t working,” said Turner, who is also a former Ohio state senator.

In the wake of the election, Democrats have been plagued with feuds between warring factions of their party with competing explanations for recent electoral failures.

The disagreements on the party’s focus and message remain real, but the mostly positive reactions to “A Better Deal” suggest a fragile detente has taken hold.

“I am not interested in replaying the past,” said Lawson, who backed Sanders overHillary Clinton from the Democrats’ 2016 presidential main race. “I am interested in moving forward and winning and carrying on the billionaire class and putting in place policies that work for the American people. How you do it’s making clear whose side you’re on.”

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

SHARING IS CARING!
Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Tweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest0Share on Reddit0