Palm oil plantations on illegally deforested land in Sumatra home to elephants, orangutans and tigers have allegedly been used to supply scores of household brands, says new report
Pepsico, Unilever and Nestl have been accused of complicity in the destruction of Sumatras last tract of rainforest shared by elephants, orangutans, rhinos, and tigers together in one ecosystem.
Plantations built on deforested land have allegedly been used to supply palm oil to scores of household brands that also include McDonalds, Mars, Kelloggs and Procter & Gamble, according to a new report.
If more immediate action is not taken to enforce no deforestation policies, these brands will be remembered as the corporate giants responsible for the destruction of the last place on earth where Sumatran elephants, orangutans, rhinos and tigers roamed side by side, says the study by Rainforest Action Network (RAN).
Using satellite data, photographic evidence and GPS coordinates, the research builds on evidence gathered earlier this year to show ongoing illegal forest clearances across swathes of the 2.6m hectare Leuser ecosystem, despite a moratorium announced last June.
The palm oil reaches major brands via a twisting supply chain that stretches from the PT Agra Bumi Niaga (ABN) logging company, which delivers to a processing mill owned by PT Ensem Sawita (ES), which then sells the palm oil on to some of the worlds largest traders. PT is an abbreviation that denotes a limited liability company in Indonesia.
PT ABN declined requests for comment but after extensive Guardian inquiries, PT ES admitted using ABNs palm oil due to confusion after the logging firm changed its name and said that it regretted this failure.
The company promised to strengthen our traceability practices by exchanging information to relevant stakeholders who have palm oil plantation data.
However, Gemma Tillack, RANs agribusiness campaigns director, said that ABNs name change had been reported, and the continued inability of palm traders and food brands to source the palm they used back to the plantations showed a wider failing of due diligence systems.
Relying on NGOs to uncover the truth is simply not good enough, she said. If RAN, with our relatively limited budget, can figure it out, then multibillion dollar, multinational corporations certainly can. The fact that they havent demonstrates that it is not a lack of ability holding them back, but a lack of will.
Indonesias president Joko Widodo responded with a moratorium on new palm oil permits last April. Two months later, Acehs governor, Zaini Abdullah ordered palm oil companies to halt all forest clearing, even where valid permits existed.
But RANs research shows that ABN continued clearing another 336 hectares of Sumatran rainforest after Abdullahs instruction, with 12 hectares of new deforestation since February.
In just one district of the Leuser, nine other suppliers to milling companies continued logging activities since last June across concessions with a combined area of more than 26,000 hectares, according to RANs research.
Tillack said: We believe that there was a rush to clear land because the [logging] companies knew that there would be government intervention to stop forest clearances.
Global brands like Pepsico can no longer hide behind paper promises and simply blame their international partners for forest crimes. The Leuser ecosystem will die a death of a thousand cuts if brands dont start taking urgent action to address the root cause of this crisis.
A spokesman for Pepsico, singled out by RAN as the ultimate snack food 20 laggard, said We take this issue very seriously, and we are making significant investments to improve every aspect of our palm oil supply chain. After being informed of the allegations, we immediately initiated a thorough investigation. While we do not source directly from the mills in question, we identified direct suppliers who had the mills in their supply chains. We have been assured that these suppliers are taking corrective actions to address the allegations.
Unilever admitted that it had indirectly bought palm oil from PT ABN through its suppliers, Wilmar and Musim Mas, and said that it had requested a response and an action plan from them soon.
Nestl also said that it was investigating the allegations with Wilmar which told the guardian that it was sending a team to the region to assess whether other sources in its supply chain were using palm oil sourcing back to PT ABNs 2,000 hectare concession.
Mars and Kelloggs stressed their sustainable palm oil policies, while Procter & Gamble said that it had told suppliers about its responsible sourcing policy. McDonalds denied any links to PT ABN.
Of the palm oil traders which supplying the food brands, IOI said that that it had registered recent deliveries from PT ES in our supply chain but that the firm had confirmed that they no longer source from PT ABN.
Golden Agri-Resources said that its exposure to PT ES was relatively small but that it would visit the company in the next weeks to find out if it was indirectly selling on palm oil from PT ABN. Cargill and Musim Mas both said that they were investigating the reports.
However, the companies had been warned about conflict palm oil entering the supply chain through PT ESs third-party suppliers since 2014, and engagement with the firm had not changed its behaviour.
Brands and traders tend to hide behind supply chain complexities, she said, but consumers need to know whether or not the palm oil they use is connected to the destruction of rainforests.