Breaking News

In Arkansas, rape survivors will be forced to notify their attacker if they get an abortion

BY NICOLE EINBINDER

Arkansas women may soon be made to inform their sexual partner or family members if they want an abortion, thanks to a provision passed from the nation’s 2017 legislative session. H.B. 1566, the Tissue Disposal Mandate, would make it illegal for a girl to have an abortion without communicating with the man who impregnated her whether that be her husband, boyfriend, a casual hook-up, or a perpetrator of sexual assault.

The new provision is connected to the state’s preexistingFinal Disposition Rights Act of 2009. In accordance with this law, family members related to the deceased person have say over what happens to the body.

Under the new provision, embryonic or fetal tissue in an abortion would be regarded as a “deceased” family member. As such, the girl and father of the fetus have equal say over its disposal. A teenage girl seeking an abortion would not have any say because, legally, she’d have to be at least 18 to exercise final disposition rights over the tissue. If the woman and her sexual partner are minors, their parents would make the choice. If he’s 18 and she’s a minor, he’s final say.

“What’s most harmful about this is that they just tied it into an existing Arkansas law that talks about disposing of human remains of any person who is deceased. And that law gets very particular on who gets the right to consent,” says Lori Williams, Clinic Director ofLittle Rock Family Planning Services, among three abortion providers in the nation. “lots of the patients do not want to involve their spouse from the decision to terminate a pregnancy. ”

Under current Arkansas law, the physician can dispose of the embryonic or fetal tissue after a surgical abortion or miscarriage via incineration or other ways, while women who opt for a medical malpractice may dispose of the tissue in the home. Under the new provision, physicians will face criminal penalties if they don’t notify the girl’s sexual partner about how he wishes to dispose of the tissue.

“He had been there at conception so he should be there throughout the whole process,”Republican Representative Kim Hammer, the invoice’s primary sponsor, informs Bustle. “I believe that all life, from conception through birth and through death by natural causes, has to be treated with dignity, respect, in addition to a unified strategy to deal with the remains. ”

The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Arkansas, along with the Center for Reproductive Rights filed a lawsuit in June,Hopkins v. Jegley, hard the supply, along with three additional measures that they sayjeopardize women’s reproductive rights at the nation. Talcott Camp, deputy director of the Reproductive Freedom Project at the ACLU, informs Bustle that the involved parties filed a motion requesting the judge to block enforcement of the law while the case is pending.

Currently, the supply is set to move in effect on July 30.

“In most cases, a girl has a circle of support in her choice. But, that circle should include the folks she brings in her family, her clinicians, her religion leader, her mother. Whoever she brings in, that’s who belongs there,” Camp says. “The state has no business notifying anybody who she doesn’t decide to bring in the circle of her choice process. ”

Abortion activists worry that if the supply were to be enacted, it would basically allow third parties to obstruct the girl’s abortion. While the law doesn’t allow the sexual partner or other household members to explicitly say they are interested in having the procedure, they must all agree on the process of disposal and may go to court when their opinions clash.

Campfears that when a woman was obligated to go to court, she could be pushed beyond the point at which she’s legally allowed to have an abortion at the nation. In Arkansas,abortions are prohibited after 22 months.

“That is all happening before she gets the abortion, because the physician has to know he or she will have the ability to dispose of the tissue legally and without facing criminal liability,” Campsays. “And, meanwhile, moment’s just a wasting. ”

The lawsuit claims the provision is unconstitutional. In the 1992 Supreme Court case ofPlanned Parenthood v. Casey, the court struck down a judgment that a woman must notify her spouse to seek out an abortion. Arkansas’ Tissue Disposal Mandate would go even further, by requiring notification of any man involved in the pregnancy.

Williams, of Little Rock Family Planning Services, clarifies the absence of protections for girls sifting through sexual assault or domestic violence as particularly alarming.

“There’s actually no protections whatsoever in place ,” she says. “And, it’s not just about consequences for rape and incest or sexual assault or domestic violence, but it’s a girl not having the capability to make this choice on her own. ”

Hammer, the invoice’s sponsor, says he doesn’t believe the law is intended to be similar to that. “I will’t speak for judges at the state of Arkansas, but I don’t find judges who finally have the hands to make that choice employing it that way,” he says when further pressed on the issue. “But, I’ll tell you, if this becomes a problem I’d be glad to bring clarity to this somebody who is in that unfortunate scenario isn’t required to perform that. I don’t concur with the idea that she would have to inform who mistreated her. ”

In 2014, around 4,590 abortions were provided in Arkansas, a 4 percent increase in abortion rates from 2011,based on the Guttmacher Institute. Along with the provisions set to be enacted in July, the nation already has a slew of restrictive abortion measures: A female must receive state-directed counselling that includes advice to dissuade her out of the procedure, as well as wait 48 hours before the procedure is provided. Additionally, abortion coverage is prohibited under state insurance exchange programs.

Camp says the hearing requested by the ACLU to delay enforcement of this Tissue Disposal Mandate is set for July 13. Meanwhile, she encourages women to stand against the laws.

“They should talk to their medical providers along with their family and they need to create their representatives accountable,” she says. “This law is blatantly immoral as it’s cruel, cruel, cruel to a woman at a time when what she needs is support and respect. ”

This story originally appeared on Bustleand has been republished with permission.

Read: http://www.dailydot.com/

Most Popular

To Top